Changes in fire protection legislation, with the introduction of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order in England and Wales and the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 that came into effect in October 2006, have major implications for owners and occupiers of commercial, public and multi-tenancy property.

However, many organisations are still to come to terms with the changes, leaving themselves open to prosecution if they fail to implement the regulatory requirements.

Recent research by Norwich Union Risk Services has made the disturbing revelation that awareness among organisations of the new fire safety legislation has hardly risen since the regulations were introduced.

Just 62% of organisations questioned were aware of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order one year after its introduction.

It is reported that in excess of 80% of businesses that experience a serious fire never fully recover. Out of the remaining 20%, 70% of those surviving business fail within two years due to the original fire. The latest insurance industry figures put the cost to businesses in the UK at around £800m.

However, insurance is unlikely to fully compensate for the interruption to your organisation. How can you compensate for the loss of a business opportunity whilst your organisation is not fully operational?

Responsibility for fire safety lies with the owners or occupiers of premises who must designate a ‘responsible person’.

With Fire and Rescue Services no longer issuing fire certificates, the onus is on the ‘responsible person’ to conduct a Fire Risk Assessment, implement the required fire precautionary and protection measures and maintain a fire management plan.

The Fire and Rescue Services have a statutory duty to enforce the legislation’s requirements.

Failing to fully comply with the fire regulations puts businesses at risk and individuals in the organisation, including the designated ‘responsible person’, could face prosecution in the event of a serious fire.

Failure to comply with fire safety requirements is also likely to result in an insurance company refusing to pay all or some of an insurance claim. So it is essential to understand and comply with legislative requirements to protect your organisation.

One important fire safety measure that is required in any premises is a fit for purpose Fire Detection and Alarm system (FD&A).

If you have a new system installed or the existing system serviced, the fire regulations require you to be able to demonstrate that the people doing the work are competent.

Third-Party Certification (TPC) is recognised as being the most effective way of ensuring your contractor is competent.

There are currently two recognised TPC schemes: BAFE SP203 (SP101for Extinguisher service) and LPS 1014. The BAFE scheme is operated by a number of certification bodies, led by the National Security Inspectorate (NSI) that is accredited through the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS).

NSI

NSI has over 135 approved companies and sites, representing the largest proportion of all third-party approvals for FD&A systems. Contractors who are NSI-approved will display the relevant approval logos, such as NSI Fire Gold and Fire Silver logos.

Companies with NSI Fire Gold approval also meet the industry-specific ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management System Standard. NSI approval is only achieved if the company meets the required industry standards on a consistent basis.

In the case of FD&A, companies must be approved for each of the areas of design, installation, commissioning and maintenance they are involved in.

Another important reason for you to choose TPC-approved companies is the new Chief Fire Officers Association (CFOA) policy for dealing with false alarms from remotely monitored systems.

CFOA wants to reduce this costly, billionpound problem that also puts the lives of those affected by real fires at risk. The policy requires owners to obtain a Unique Reference Number (URN), entitling them to receive a fire brigade response to automated alarm systems.

URNs will only be issued for systems certified by specific TPC bodies, such as NSI. This policy is now being phased in and ultimately all systems requiring response through remote monitoring will need to have been designed, installed, commissioned and maintained by suppliers who are TPC-approved.

In the case of fire protection systems, owners may be required to prove that their system is fit for purpose and the only recognisable way to achieve this is through TPC.

NSI is an independent, not-for-profit approvals body that operates in the fire and security sectors. Formerly known as NACOSS (NACOSS Gold is now an NSI scheme for electronic security system installers), NSI’s focus is centred on encouraging companies to achieve the highest standard of service required by customers of fire and security contractors.

To this end, NSI requires its approved companies to meet standards that exceed the minimum recognised level - a successful approach acknowledged by customers and specifiers for over 35 years.

Whatever fire protection work is required, customers should always use only those companies approved via officially recognised TPC bodies.

Further information: NSI, Tel: 0845 006 3003, www.nsi-fire.org.uk